- June 2021 (1)
- November 2020 (1)
- June 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (1)
- July 2019 (1)
- June 2016 (1)
- 04: Ten years linked open data (22)
- August 2015 (1)
- June 2015 (1)
- November 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (1)
- August 2014 (1)
- 26: Library Linked Data Happening (2)
- June 2014 (1)
- December 2013 (1)
- 01: Linked data or die! (1)
- November 2013 (1)
- August 2013 (1)
- 09: A day between the stacks (2)
- June 2013 (2)
- March 2013 (1)
- 22: Beyond The Library (47)
- January 2013 (1)
- 07: (Discover AND deliver) OR else (98)
- October 2012 (1)
- 10: Change or be irrelevant (28)
- January 2012 (1)
- September 2011 (1)
- 02: FRBR outside the box (10)
- March 2011 (1)
- 28: Missing links (1)
- December 2010 (1)
- October 2010 (1)
- 07: Dutch Culture Link (6)
- July 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (1)
- March 2010 (1)
- 04: Mobile library services (3)
- February 2010 (2)
- 21: Mobile app or mobile web? (11)
- 16: Mainframe to mobile (11)
- January 2010 (1)
- 22: Mobile reading (6)
- December 2009 (1)
- 29: Old library, new library (5)
- November 2009 (1)
- 19: Is an e-book a book? (9)
- October 2009 (2)
- 16: Just in time or just in case? (4)
- 06: Roadmaps to uncertainty (1)
- August 2009 (2)
- 20: Explicit and implicit metadata (12)
- 11: Relevance in context (5)
- June 2009 (1)
- 19: Linked Data for Libraries (8)
- May 2009 (2)
- 24: No future for libraries? (11)
- 15: Who needs MARC? (22)
- April 2009 (3)
- 27: ReTweet @Reply – Twitter communities (1)
- 24: Replacing our ILS, business as usual (2)
- 12: UMR – Unified Metadata Resources (7)
- March 2009 (1)
- 30: Tweeting libraries (4)
- February 2009 (2)
- 15: Collection 2.0 (0)
- 04: Unique authors (0)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (2)
- 10: Open Stack 2.0 (0)
- 02: Antisocial Networking (2)
- October 2008 (5)
- 17: System librarians 2.0 (2)
- 12: How open are open systems? (2)
- 08: Library Systems and the world of hardware (0)
- 05: LING – Library integration next generation (0)
- 03: So, commonplace.net…. (1)